PBS to Recognize Five Outstanding Alumni at Annual Banquet, Oct 17

 

 

On Friday, October 17 PBS will hold its second annual Alumni Recognition event, a day of symposia and celebrations to honor the IU psychological and brain sciences community. The annual daylong event includes talks by PBS alumni and faculty at the cutting edge of their fields. It also includes undergraduate career and professional development round table discussions for PBS majors interested in business, social work, and law, as well as the mental health professions and graduate research. The day culminates in a banquet to honor five outstanding alumni with a series of awards.

(For a list of the day's events, see schedule below.)
.

Amy Marshall (PhD ’04) and Brian Mustanski (PhD ’04) will each receive a Young Alumni Award

Marshall is an associate professor in the Department of Psychology at Pennsylvania State University whose research interests include intimate relationships, family violence, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Mustanski is an associate professor in Medical Social Sciences, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Psychology at Northwestern University.  He is director of the IMPACT LGBT Health and Development Program, which seeks to conduct translational research that improves the health of the LGBT community and increases understanding of sexual orientation and gender identity. 

Receiving Distinguished Alumni Awards are David T. Pfenninger (BA ’83) and Wilson (Bill) Geisler (PhD ’75)

Pfenninger’s career spans academia, clinical psychology, business, and technology. Formerly an assistant professor at the Indiana University School of Medicine and a clinician and administrator at the Roudebush Veteran Administration Medical Center in Indianapolis, he became the founder and key entrepreneur of several successful companies. Currently, he is an executive consultant, investor, and board member to companies at the interface of internet technology, human behavior, and cognition.

Geisler joined the psychology faculty at the University of Texas in 1975, where he is currently the David Wechsler Regents Chair and director of the Center for Perceptual Systems. Bill’s primary research interests are in perception and perceptual neuroscience, with an emphasis on vision in humans and monkeys. 

John Monahan (PhD ’72) will receive the Richard C. Atkinson Lifetime Achievement Award

 

Monahan, an expert in law and psychiatry, is a leading thinker on the issue of violence risk assessment. He currently holds the John S. Shannon Distinguished Professorship in Law at the University of Virginia. Last year he attended the department’s 125^th Anniversary Celebration to deliver a lecture, “Danger and Disorder,” in which he challenged the links made between violence and mental illness in American media and culture. The award is named in honor of its first alumni recipient, president emeritus of the University of California and a distinguished scientist, administrator, and teacher.

 

Schedule of Events

• 12 PM: Luncheon, Lobby of Multidisciplinary Science Building II, (behind the Psychology Building, 702 North Walnut Grove Avenue)
• 1PM: PBS @ IU: #GameChangers (presentations from alumni), Room 100, Psychology Building

• Teresa Treat, University of Iowa, “Enhancing the Accuracy of Men’s Perception of Women’s Sexual Interest”   

• Joshua Gulley, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, “Amphetamines during Adolescence: #BrainChangers”   

• Scott Gronlund, University of Oklahoma, “Conducting an Eyewitness Lineup: How Did We Get It Wrong?”

2PM: Break

2:15PM: PBS@IU: #TheCuttingEdge, Faculty Symposium, Psychology Building, Room 100

 

• Brian D’Onofrio, Indiana University, “The Importance of Translational Epidemiology for Clinical Science”
• Karin James, Indiana University, “How Visual-Motor Experience Changes  Symbol Learning During Development:  An Educational Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective”   
• Josh Brown, Indiana University, “Computational Psychiatry: Where Higher Cognitive Function Intersects with Computational Neuroscience, Neuroimaging, and Clinical Science”

3:30PM: Graduate Research Symposium & Poster Session. Lobby of Multidisciplinary Science Building

6:00PM: Cocktail Reception, Neal-Marshall Black Culture Center Grand Hall

7PM: Alumni Awards Dinner, Neal-Marshall Black Culture Center Grand Hall

 

 

 

 

PBS network scientist leads effort to launch the first center for network science in Russia

IU network researcher Stanley Wasserman in collaboration with faculty from the National Research University Higher School of Economics (NRU HSE) in Russia received a $1.5 million grant to set up an International Laboratory for Applied Network Research at the Russian university.

The grant, which was awarded by the HSE, provides funding from 2014 to 2016, at which point, Wasserman believes, the lab, given its strengths, will continue to gain support, with either  additional funding from the university or  external grants.  Quite a few network science institutes now operate at universities in the US. This is the first one in Russia.

Wasserman, who holds a joint appointment in the departments of Statistics and Psychological and Brain Sciences in the College of Arts and Sciences, will serve as the academic supervisor for the lab—consulting, teaching, and collaborating with faculty and students at the school and ensuring the lab’s connectedness with the broader world of network science. He has also been named a Research Professor at HSE.

As a leading methodologist in the field of network analysis, Wasserman designs studies and analyzes data for researchers around the world in such varied areas as management, community psychology, and public health. He is also the coordinating editor of Network Science, a major new journal in the field published by Cambridge University Press. His book "Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications" is a classic in the field, still in print after almost 20 years, and widely used in university courses. His work has also contributed to putting Indiana University on the leading edge of advancements in the field itself. He was one of the first network scientists at IU, and through conference grants, collaborations, and teaching, he continues to be an important network research presence on campus.

Wasserman’s relationship with the Higher School of Economics in Russia began two years ago when he taught a standing-room only introductory seminar on network analysis at the school. At that point, says Valentina Kuskova, director of the new lab, he and others recognized the enormous demand in Russia for knowledge of the discipline and set out to develop the current laboratory.

Wasserman’s participation has been key to the project’s visibility and success, Kuskova explains. “This lab would simply not have been possible without him. Wasserman,” she states, “is a visionary. As a scientific supervisor, he goes beyond providing ideas, inspiration, and encouragement. The results speak for themselves. We are well on our way to establishing and popularizing the field of network research in Russia.”

The new International Laboratory, one of twenty at the school, is itself a network made up of four hubs, each on different HSE campuses—two in Moscow, one in St. Petersburg, and one in Perm. United by common methodologies, tools, and techniques, the research applications span multiple disciplines and areas: political science, education, psychology, management, international business, sociology, and economics. The lab has already taught two week-long workshops in network analysis (one in Moscow in June and a second in St Petersburg in August) and has a number of joint projects well underway.

The lab also has several partnerships and joint research projects with other centers for network analysis in the United States. An international conference, organized by the lab, with invited workshops, is planned for November 2014.

Among some of the current research are studies of student academic achievement as a function of social networks, studies on the relationships between companies and their subsidiaries, studies of public health, and studies of current and historical political and social movements in Russia and the U.S.

Wasserman notes that changes in Russia and the Russian economy over the last 20 years have sparked new interests. “Until recently there was no need for a faculty of management in Russia. Now there are big companies and a need for savvy managers. One of my colleagues studies the energy industry, for example. Russia supplies most of Europe with oil and natural gas. She looks at how energy companies interact with each other and their subsidiaries.”

Over the last twenty years network analysis has become widespread across Europe. The first European conference on network research was in Barcelona in July 2014. In the 21st century, globalization and the recognition of interconnectedness, along with the emergence of the Internet and social media, make network methods an increasingly fitting way to examine many aspects of the social world.

The network under investigation might be social, economic or mathematical. It could examine the spread of ideas, products, diseases, a cultural fad or new technology. Yet, at the center of network science is the idea that connectivity, systematicity, and dependence between the units or actors of a network are essential to greater understanding of those units and their organization.

“In order to really study who behaves the way they behave and why, you need relational data,” said Wasserman, “This enables us to see social influence in action.”

To learn more about the lab and to speak with Wasserman, contact Liz Rosdeitcher at 812-855-4507 or rosdeitc@indiana.edu.

An InExact Science

In her new podcast, PBS alumna Lisa Cantrell (PhD 2013) explores basic questions of psychological science—and human experience--through beautifully designed sonic landscapes  

Art and science often seem worlds apart. But when the two meet up in Lisa Cantrell’s new podcast, An InExact Science, sparks fly between them, igniting visions of a long, happy, well-lived future, mutually beneficial to both.

Since she graduated from PBS last year and began her new gig as a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of California, Davis, Lisa Cantrell (PhD 2013) has been dreaming up, plotting out and putting together episodes for her podcast project, “An InExact Science.” The first podcasts will appear online by early November at http://aninexactscience.podbean.com/. In January they will begin airing on KDVS in Davis.

In An InExact Science, Cantrell plumbs the mysteries of every day human experience by offering the perspectives of top researchers in psychological science alongside the stories of “ordinary people” (aka non-scientists).  In this way, she seeks to build “a small bridge,” as she calls it, “between what we sense every day and the empirical evidence of science.”

“Why do we experience happiness? How do we learn a first language and why is learning a second sometimes hard? Under what circumstances do we feel regret? Why do we remember certain events but not others? Why do we sometimes misremember? Where does religious belief come from?”

These are the questions that propel a podcast that, she announces in her promotional video, will be “about us, FOR us, and will invite science to pull up a chair, stay a while, have a cup of coffee—heck, stay for dinner! And explain at least a little of why we experience the things we experience.”

But the conversation is hardly one-sided. Language, memory, music, religion or regret—whatever the topic might be—she will also expose what she calls “the beautiful side, the phenomenological side, of what it feels like to experience a particular thing” so that the topic is “not just objectified in the way that science does to explain things.”

In putting these views together, she seeks to produce something artfully and beautifully designed. “I love listening to podcasts that are done really well,” she explains, “the way they move information along and shape a topic. The shows that are really good”—she mentions Radiolab, Snap Judgment, and 99% Invisible—“create a space that has layers. You feel like you’re in a certain room or environment just by the sounds that are happening. They have a beautiful organization and structure.”

But not only is the podcast artfully designed, it is also poised to prompt what she calls a “science-art-what-up!” cycle. Alongside top researchers and a story-telling public, she is enlisting local artists to produce promotional materials. (Go to the website and you will find buttons, posters, t-shirts, coffee mugs.) And she is drawing on the music of local musicians to include in her show. (One of the first episodes includes music of the Bloomington band, Busman’s Holiday.)

Not surprisingly perhaps, Cantrell herself comfortably occupies the worlds of both art and science. A South Carolina native, she started college at Furman University as a visual arts major, but shifted gears when she realized this path would most likely provide little means of support. Not knowing what to do next, she took time off from college and traveled in Latin America. She worked in an adolescent rehabilitation center in Chile while living and painting in an art collective, and she taught preschool English in Mexico.

The experience brought home to her the mysteries of language learning, and on her return to college, she took a psychology course that got her “super hooked,” as she puts it, on the topic…

…Ultimately landing her straight in the lab of one of the foremost researchers on language learning and early development, PBS Distinguished Professor and Chancellor’s Professor, Linda Smith. The first episode of An InExact Science, in fact, is on language and features an interview with her former advisor. (Listen to a teaser for this episode here.)

Now she is working in the Infant Cognition Lab of Lisa Oakes, a professor of psychology at UC Davis, and is studying visual attention and memory in infants and the use of eye-tracking methodology. In virtually all of her spare time, she can be found working on the podcast, uniting art and science in what she hopes will be a long-term relationship to a renewable and everlasting “science-art-what-up” cycle.

Watch the promotional video for the project.  Or listen to a teaser for the first episode.

A Kickstarter campaign to fund equipment and travel for the podcast will be ongoing until September 12.

Discovering a Passion for Science

Local high school students and others participating in Project SEED experience science firsthand in research labs of the IU psychological and brains sciences, chemistry, and astronomy departments

On July 18 Project SEED participants presented their summer research in a poster session in the lobby of the MSBII building on the IUB campus.

Local high-schoolers seeking to explore what life as a scientist is all about need to look no further than Project SEED. The program began in Indianapolis in 1968 and was brought to Bloomington just last year when the program coordinator  Elmer Sanders asked IU psychological and brain sciences professor Sharlene Newman if a local high school student could work in her lab during the summer. One student became five students, which became nine students this year. They joined labs in chemistry and astronomy, in addition to those in psychological and brain sciences.

Project SEED is open to everyone, but has a particular interest in recruiting economically disadvantaged students, who have an interest in science and a desire to experience science in a research lab firsthand. It offers the financial support the students might need and at the same time it gives them a peek into a promising career. They work in the lab and have weekly seminars on topics related to scientific research: writing abstracts, constructing posters, and guidance on such topics as how to choose and apply to colleges.

“We want to expose these kids to science, let them know what research is about and hopefully encourage them to pursue scientific careers,” Newman says.  She admits she herself has a special interest in getting the word out about psychological science. “So many people are not aware of what psychology is. They do not realize how broad it is, that it has a strong computational side and that it includes neuroscience as well as social and clinical psychology.”

In Newman’s lab incoming IU freshman Olivia Lancaster is learning how to use the EEG machine and interpret its data. Specifically, she is learning how to analyze the various brain waves produced as the brain processes language. Lancaster has always been interested in the brain but was surprised how much she also really liked the data analysis involved—and how her training here has allowed her to understand so much.

“You’re getting so much hands-on attention from your mentor and they are very patient and understanding. They don’t expect you to understand it all immediately. It’s not as if you’re in a large lecture hall where you’re afraid to raise your hand,” says Lancaster, former Bloomington South student who will be attending IU in the fall where she plans to major in psychology.

Of all the research labs he toured at the beginning, a study on Fingerprint Identification in the lab of professor and associate PBS chair Tom Busey was North senior Mac Vogelsang’s first choice. The lab wanted him, too, thanks to his sophisticated knowledge of computer programs used in it. “We’re trying to figure out if people look at fingerprints the way they look at faces, seeing them as a whole, rather than in parts,” he explains.

One of the interesting realizations he had here was “how useful statistics are. I had taken a class in it just last year and I was surprised how relevant it was,” he says. ”It can be applied in any field, not just science or math, because its methods are used for analyzing all kinds of data.”

Morgan Newman, a North senior who participated in the program last summer, was able to pick up where she left off last summer in the research lab of Bill Hetrick, professor and PBS chair, who studies schizophrenia. This summer she is helping to complete a project begun last year in the lab, developing the equipment needed to perform a technique known as eye-blink conditioning inside a brain scanner. The equipment, made right here in the department’s own workshop, will ultimately enable scientists to perform experiments that will help them gain new insights into parts of the brain affected by schizophrenia.

Also back for his second year is incoming IU freshman Dedric Dennist from Milwaukee at work in professor Linda Smith’s Cognitive Development Lab and now designing a study of his own. Recent North graduate Greg Lopes was thrilled to have a chance to experience the day-to-day work in the social psychology lab of researcher Mary Murphy, “running subjects” in a study that seeks to understand how we can improve everyday interracial interactions.  Lopes enters Stanford University this fall as a student in chemical engineering, but has a strong interest in social psychology, which the program made it possible for him to explore.

Each student in Project SEED works closely with a member of their lab. Busey, for example, typically spent a couple of hours a day with Mac Vogelsang, discussing various questions that arose in their research on fingerprint perception, as well as the difficulties of data analysis. Among those questions, they debated how best to share the research questions with a study’s participants. “We talked about trade-offs that come with different experiments and had an interesting discussion,” Busey notes. “It’s been instructive for both of us.”  In fact the two plan to continue working together in the fall.

Newman describes how gratifying it is to see the students’ experience unfold during the summer. “They’re all a little scared when they start. But by the third week things begin to click, the research papers they read start to make sense, and by the time they get to present their posters, they’re usually really excited about their research.”

For IU psychological and brain sciences chair, Bill Hetrick, the presence of these students is refreshing. “I thoroughly enjoy having young scientists in the lab. Their newfound excitement and enthusiasm for scientific inquiry is infectious and reacts synergistically with the deep passion I have for research.”

Joshua Brown presents research at FENS Forum on Neuroscience in Milan

Speaking today at the 2014 FENS Forum on Neuroscience in Milan, PBS cognitive neuroscientist Joshua Brown discussed current research on how people predict and recognize the consequences of their future actions.

"The brain forms expectations about how things should work out, and then compares against what actually happens — or fails to happen," said Brown in the press release. "We're building on that notion of simply recognizing a mistake. We're examining how the brain then predicts outcomes of actions we haven't yet taken — and how those brain areas help us recognize and avoid future mistakes or risky situations.”

Developing a computer model combined with brain imaging, Brown's team demonstrated that error evaluation and prediction involves distinct regions of the brain within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and especially within the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). These regions collectively learn to predict consequences and detect surprising events, both good and bad.

Prior studies showed activity in the ACC as or just after people detect their mistake, leading some scientists to describe it as part of the brain's 'oops' center. But the computer model suggested and confirmed that the ACC also detects and tries to prevent possible future errors, as an 'early warning system' helping us bypass risky situations. "Simulating varying situations with these neural models helps us more accurately assess how specific brain areas may learn to predict outcomes of our actions, and perceive future risk," said Brown.

Psychology & Cybersecurity

This January work began on a major new long-term project, which will lay the groundwork for a new, highly interdisciplinary science in which psychology plays a critical role. At stake are not only the personal and financial information of individuals everywhere, but the safety of nations, and the lives of individuals in combat and other state ventures across the globe. Not surprisingly, the White House has an interest and will have direct oversight of the project. 

Bennett Bertenthal, the James H. Rudy Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences, is one of 17 principal investigators from five major universities to receive a grant, awarded in October, from the Army Research Lab to collaborate in a ten-year study of cybersecurity. The group, brought together by Penn State researcher Patrick McDaniel, a professor of computer science and engineering, was chosen from a competitive field to launch a research program on cybersecurity with an initial five-year grant of $24 million. An opportunity to renew in another five years makes this a nearly $50 million project. 

Bertenthal is one of three principal investigators at IU, who together have received $3.5 million of these funds. The others at IU include School of Informatics and Computing professor L. Jean Camp and School of Public and Environmental Affairs professor Diane Henshel.

As Bertenthal explains, “The army has become increasingly concerned about the vulnerability of its defense networks and wants to have a comprehensive research agenda to ensure they are doing everything possible to detect, prevent, and assess the risk of attack.” 

As a cognitive scientist, his work addresses the human dimension of a problem that ranges widely across heterogeneous systems of computer networks and can involve the entire army command around the world.

Many instances of cyber-warfare, he says, “are attacks on actual physical systems or on software itself. But a huge component remains the human dimension and the degree to which individuals can be deceived into providing secure information or just because of their own lack of knowledge provide information that will reduce the security of the computer system.”

“The weak links,” he says, “are often people—people not knowing that they are being deceived into providing credentials or secure information.”
The initial task in the study will be to identify and create models of different kinds of computer users, from attackers to defenders. They will conduct surveys of various groups, both computer experts and novices, from students and ordinary citizens, to army personnel of all ranks, as well as computer hackers. (They will attend a hackers’ conference this summer for this purpose.)

In a second phase of research he and his research staff, he says, “will look at real-time behavior in a computer environment to see how variables such as fatigue, cognitive load, depletion of cognitive resources, or multitasking might lead someone to become less guarded about warnings or signs of an attack. Experimental research on individuals will then be compared to the different models that people in the group are developing.”

“Ultimately,” he explains, “a lot of what we’re doing is trying to understand scenarios where there is risk, figure out how to identify real attacks and how to mitigate against them. You want to develop models that will help to detect and diagnose if a computer is being attacked.” 

And whether we are talking about military secrets, personal banking information, or a database full of social security numbers, the problem, he adds, “does not stop with the military. It affects all of us now.

“That is why it is a ten-year project.”

One New York Times, three PBS students: From "highchair philosophers" to schadenfreude, a recent New York Times features the work of current and former PBS students

 

For an explanation of why we watch reality TV or why toddlers play vigorously with their nonsolid food, take a look at the December 23^rd Science Times. You will also find in these stories the names of several current and former PBS students: Katie Boucher, a current postdoctoral student of Mary Murphy and former grad student of B. J. Rydell; Lynn Perry, a former PBS undergraduate major who completed her honors thesis with Linda Smith; and Larissa Samuelson, former graduate student of Smith. Perry is now a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Samuelson is an associate professor at the University of Iowa.

Boucher is featured in a book review of "The Joy of Pain: Schadenfreude and the Dark Side of Human Nature" by University of Kentucky psychology professor Richard Smith. Boucher worked with Smith as an undergraduate on the topic of “schadenfreude,” the pleasure taken in others’ pain.

Schadenfreude, the reviewer explains, is an antidote to the envy we feel when we measure ourselves against others and come up short. The urge to make social comparisons may be hard-wired—studies show that even monkeys and dogs measure themselves against their peers. Yet schadenfreude, somewhat perversely perhaps, enables us to undo the envy we may feel as a result of negative comparisons. It also may  explain the satisfaction we get from watching reality TV or reading the National Enquirer, two topics of Boucher’s research as an undergraduate. Seeing others’ downfall, especially if they have more fame and fortune than ourselves, makes us feel better about our own un-filmed or un-prosperous lives.

In "To Smoosh Peas is to Learn," Perry and Samuelson provide the fodder (so to speak) for science writer Perri Klass in her musings on toddlers' table manners. Children are generally much better at learning about solid objects than nonsolid objects, which require a bit more exploration. The highchair provides an effective context for learning about nonsolid substances because it is where children are accustomed to encountering them, and the more they interact with those substances, the more they learn.

Campus honors Lana Fish, PBS Human Resources Coordinator, at Staff Merit Award ceremony

On Monday, December 16, IU Provost Lauren Robel led the annual ceremony to celebrate the “remarkable accomplishments” of six exceptional IUB staff members. Not surprisingly, beloved PBS Human Resources Coordinator Lana Fish was among them. The others were Jay Owens, Douglas J. Burcham, and James Robert Gregg from the Physical Plant, Jennifer Mitchner from SPEA and David Sprinkle in Physics.

Now in its 34^th year, the award ceremony is a unique occasion to recognize the immense contributions of IUB staff. Provost Robel set the tone by calling attention to these 5,400 individuals whose work each day literally makes the whole academic enterprise run.

To stand out in such a crowd is no small feat, but if anyone can, it is Lana, who has served the department since 1983, first as clinic coordinator, then as human resources coordinator for the whole department.

The nomination letters for the award passionately and persuasively convey those qualities that made it possible for her do so.

“Hiring Lana Fish,” said one, “proved to be one of the best decisions of my career. As the department’s most dedicated, caring, cheerful, unselfish, reliable, competent, and beloved staff member, she has kept the department running smoothly, happily, and efficiently for many years. With her unassuming, unflappable, loyal, generous, and unerringly competent style, Lana is the consummate example of the ideal professional staff member.  IU has been graced by her unsurpassed service.”

“She was my wise mentor,” said another, “training me not to take issues personally, to open my mind to all sides kindly, but logically, to make the best decision for the department, and then to implement that decision transparently, firmly, but with respect for all involved. In summary, this is an outstanding human being and professional who–every day–makes Psychological and Brain Sciences, and IU, work, and does this with a life wisdom that is truly inspirational.”

Or as a third explained, she has been the confidant of four successive chairs, the most senior faculty as well as first-year faculty and graduate students. “Unmatched in her skill, professionalism, diplomacy, and character, her wisdom and unwavering commitment to the good of the whole has made her the bedrock of our department.”

As for Lana herself, she is overcome with emotion in describing the event, especially the response of PBS colleagues, who made up a disproportionately large part of the audience: “To see PBS standing up and cheering, all that support, it was overwhelming.”

Three-time Olympic coach and PBS Professor of Practice Jeffrey Huber wins USA Diving's 2013 National Diving Coach of the Year Award

 

Former US Olympic coach and current Psychological and Brain Sciences Professor of Practice Jeffrey Huber may have put his coaching career behind him, but he is still winning awards. At a special award ceremony on December 20 in Austin, Texas, at the USA Diving Winter National Championships, Huber will receive the 2013 National Diving Coach of the Year Award, which follows the success of his team at the 2013 National Diving Championship. This is the thirteenth time he has won the award since 1998.

Insofar as the award is based on his team’s performance at the 2013 national competition, Huber insists, "It is really their award as much as it is mine."

Huber’s Indiana Diving team won the overall team championship title at the 2013 AT&T National Diving Championships. The IU men's team won the men's team title and the women's team finished third as a team. Four of Huber's athletes represented Team USA in international competitions in 2013, including Amy Cozad, who competed for Team USA at the2013 FINA World Championships in Barcelona, Spain.

Cozad, now an assistant diving coach at Florida State University, gives us a glimpse into Huber's coaching style and the strategy behind his success. "He has absolute confidence in the abilities of his divers," she explains, "and instills this confidence in them. Within my first week at IU he pulled me into his office and said if you do everything I tell you, you will be in the 2012 Olympics." (He was not far off. At the 2012 Olympic trials, Cozad came in third, but only the top two divers made the Olympic team. She competed in nearly every other international diving event while being coached by Huber at Indiana University.)

He would also recreate the conditions, psychological and otherwise, of a competition, in their everyday practice and training. As Cozad explained, "He always said that because competition and practice are so different, you need to consider how you will be thinking under the stress of competition and prepare yourself for those circumstances."

Huber was head diving coach at IU from 1989 to 2013. He received the highest national and international honors and awards for his coaching, including three-time US Olympic Coach, USOC National Coach of the Year, NCAA Diving Coach of the Year, Big Ten Diving Coach of the Year for the men's and women's teams almost every year between 1992 and 2013, and four-time winner of the US National Diving Championship Coach of Excellence Award.

Huber is especially proud of the most recent award. “Coming at the end of a 37-year career, it means a great deal to me. It tells me that I finished my career as I started it, by giving 100% effort to my athletes, my profession, and my university.”

This spring Huber will be teaching a PBS course on the psychology of human performance, which will explore the application of psychological theories to elite-level athletic performance and other types of motor-learning and performance, such as dance, theatre, physical education, and physical therapy. Huber will also be teaching Introductory Psychology.

In the above photo: Back row, left to right: Jeffrey Huber, John Wingfield, Andrew Hull, Danton Rogers, Conor Murphy, Casey Johnson. Front row: Chris Heaton, Amy Cozad, Kate Hillman, Zach Cooper, Toby Stanley, Michael Mosca, and Darian Schmidt

Read more about the award at USA Diving: http://www.usadiving.org/whats-new/2013/11/usa-diving-announces-annual-award-winners/

Glenn Close's IU visit includes a discussion on stigma and mental illness with PBS professor Olaf Sporn's Themester class on "The Connected Brain"

On November 5, Glenn Close stopped in on PBS professor Olaf Sporn's P457 seminar, "The Connected Brain," as part of her trip to the campus to raise awareness of mental illness and combat the stigma that surrounds it. Accompanied by IU sociologist Bernice Pescosolido, who studies stigma and mental health, the class visit followed her large public lecture at the Whittenberger Auditorium. Sporns’ course is one of the 2013 Themester course offerings related to “Networks in a Complex World” and the discussion started with a question of how social networks might or might not help raise awareness and combat stigma.

Undergraduate Senior Elliot Layden asked a question on whether knowledge of the physical or organic causes of mental illness might help to reverse its stigma. Close responded with an anecdote that suggested it might not.

On a visit to a graduate neuroscience lab at a large, prestigious university, she spent some time with the graduate students in the lab. One woman in particular had stood out as a really articulate, star student among them. When Close got up to go to the bathroom, the woman followed her out and came up to her weeping. She told Close that she suffered from serious depression and could never divulge this to others in the lab or she would lose their respect and her standing in the lab.

Sporns further explored the issue, pointing out the way such “organic or physical causes” themselves have complex relationships to the world in which they exist. Social experience, including the experience of being stigmatized, can affect and alter brain chemistry and function. He called attention to the work being done on embodiment that reveals the complex way in which the physical structures and functions of the brain respond to and are shaped by social and environmental phenomena.

Pescosolido added to this with the notion that for this reason, it was necessary for many fields to come together to tackle the topic: neuroscientists and psychologists, anthropologist and sociologists, to name a few. No single view can capture the complexity of mental illness and stigma.

“We are now trying to work together,” she explained, “so we can see how the brain, how social relationships, how different social contexts all work together in terms of changing the brain, changing people’s lives, because we now know it’s very complex. We now know all of those things are working together in concert.”

Mary Murphy an APS "Rising Star" Award Winner

Congratulations to Mary Murphy!

Mary has just been named a 2013 Rising Star by the American Psychological Society. Look for her profile in the May/June issue of the APS Observer. As noted by APS, the award places Mary "among an impressive cohort of individuals who in the early stages of their career are already making significant contributions in psychological science."

Mary joins previous recipients of this prestigious award from our department, Brian D'Onofrio in 2012 and BJ Rydell in 2011.

One strand of her research seeks to broaden our understanding of interracial interactions and offer strategies to improve them. In work she began this January she examines the challenges faced in one-on-one interracial interactions between White, Black, and Latino individuals. The study examines how two factors--the racial diversity of an interaction partner’s friendship network and the goals they adopt for the interaction--influence both partners' experiences.

Her hope is to "illuminate factors and mechanisms underlying positive interracial interaction so that we can create a diverse society that works together."
 

A second strand of her research focuses on structural and contextual barriers for women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math.  Here she is developing the "cues hypothesis" that suggests that subtle situational cues in the environment can trigger experiences of identity threat, decreased belonging, and decreased desire to persist in these environments.  These subtle situational cues may have powerful and far-reaching effects for potential targets of stereotypes and stigma. 

 

Her aims here are to make those cues visible and to understand the mechanisms underlying them so that, through interventions, identity-threatening cues are less likely to hamper the lives of stigmatized people.